Showing posts with label Rachel Hanson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rachel Hanson. Show all posts

Friday, December 4, 2015

Rhetoric Definition 2

Throughout the semester, my definition of rhetoric has not changed, but it has gained more meaning. I had less of an understanding about what writing and speaking in rhetoric was before this class. I now know what rhetoric is and how to use it in my writing. I have learned how to be persuasive and convincing. I learned how the rhetor is supposed to have an impact on an audience in order to convince them. “The art of effective expression” is the definition we were first given. This definition is perhaps the simplest way to define rhetoric. The word “effective” is a simple way to sum up that writing in rhetoric has to be convincing, persuasive, and make an impact on an audience. 
Before this class, my understanding of ethos, pathos, and logos was not complete. I now believe I do have a complete understanding of these forms of rhetoric writing. I now understand their importance and in what contexts the can and should be used. I know that ethos is an appeal to ethics. Ethos is a means of convincing a person of the credibility or character of a persuader. It can be used to take advantage of an audience’s opinions of right and wrong to persuade them of your argument. Pathos is an appeal to emotion. Pathos is the way to convince audiences of your argument by tapping into their emotions and creating an emotional response. This can be used to convince an audience of something by making them feel, whether it is making them feel positively or negatively.  Logos is an appeal to logic. Logos is a way of persuading an audience by using reason and facts. When someone uses logos, they have to back up their argument with facts and valid reasons. 
Using rhetoric writing in this class helped me understand how to recognize problems easier. We were asked to point out problems about things and find a solution for our final paper. We had to argue our solution and why it should be executed. For our paper, we were to talk about a problem in our hometown and how to fix it. This helped me understand how to use rhetoric in my writing. In fight club, we had to speak about a number of debatable issues and present arguments. This helped me learn how to use rhetoric in my speaking. 

Learning how to use rhetoric helped me practice how to be more persuasive and form valid arguments. No audience will be convinced of something unless valid arguments are stated. Valid arguments have to be backed up with facts and use ethos, pathos, or logos to appeal to an audience. When appealing to a specific audience, a writer may change what they say. Arguments should be made to be specific to the audience a writer is trying to reach. Writers need to examine the audience, occasion, purpose, and subject before beginning to write in rhetoric. They need to gather information and form an argument that possibly will appeal to a number of audiences, instead of just the target.

Wednesday, December 2, 2015

Friday, November 20, 2015

Research Paper Analysis

        I think this research paper helped me in a number of ways. The process of writing this essay was effective in helping me learn about campus resources. I learned how to use the online library database and also how to check out a physical book. I also learned how to make an appointment with the University Writing Services. The UWS was extremely helpful in my writing process. 
I believe all the proper preparation for this paper was made. However, I think the process of writing this essay was too long. This process possibly did not need to be stretched out over such a long period of time. If this amount of time was required to be used to practice writing papers, then perhaps several smaller essays would have been more effective than writing one large essay. 

The amount of in-class writing was enough because I write more efficiently outside of the classroom. Although it is easier to get one-on-one help while writing in a classroom setting, it is just as easy to write a draft outside of class and turn it in for revisions. The feedback on our papers was helpful in determining what needed to be corrected or revised. I also believe peer-editing is a very effective method because it allows students to get a perspective other than the professor’s. Having several people read a piece of writing is a way to ensure all mistakes are caught and many different suggestions are made.

Thursday, November 19, 2015

Fight Club 11/19: President of Mizzou

Pro-he should step down
Andrew 

  • There were numerous incidents during his time as president. He did nothing about the incidents and brushed them under the rug. He is the face of the university, so he should have acted.
  • He cannot control what happens, but he should have taken steps to support the people affected by the racial issues.
  • He should have reprimanded the offenders. There should be stricter policies towards racial slurs.
  • There is a low percentage of African American faculty members at Mizzou. 
  • The president chose not to do anything about it. He had a lack of response to incidents which is why the protestors were upset.
    • Counter (Matthew): It is a small incident between specific groups. It is not a campus-wide event. The president should not have to deal with this. The smaller departments should be targeted. The president is more of a business leader of the university.
  • (Moderator:) How will the leadership change affect the problem?
    • The new president will make this his/her priority. A change in leadership will be good for the morale of the students. A fresh face is good in a time when the student body is aggravated.


Con-he should not step down
Matthew

  • It does not resolve the problem. It will take time to find a new president to fill in. It is not his responsibility to monitor what individual students say to each other. 
    • (Moderator:) The president is the face of the university so shouldn't he be responsible for the students of his university?
      • When adolescents are put together in a college setting, incidents will happen. This is the case at any university. Perpetrator should be reprimanded, but the president should not be responsible for their actions. The perpetrator should be responsible for his/her own actions.
  • When students are together they will do stupid things. These incidents should not result in the loss of someone's job.
  • It is a student body issue. The president should be given time to solve the problem.
  • The protestors blew the issue out of proportion. It is unfortunate that people were racially offended, but this slip should not force the president to resign. Everyone makes mistakes. He could have used this as learning experience for the future of his career.
    • Counter (Andrew): Why should he be given a second chance? He has been given many second chances in the past.

Friday, November 13, 2015

Short Story / Vocab Continuation

Short Story / Vocab
11/6/15

My (point of view) life got pretty interesting when my partner, (flat character) and I became an undercover spies. My partner, who is not the sharpest knife in the drawer, (appositive) and I used to be cops but we weren’t (contraction) very good at it. This is a result of our first arrest; we forgot to read a man his rights. It is against the law to arrest someone without reading their Miranda rights. (data)(evidence) After that, we were moved to a secret undercover unit. This unit had hidden headquarters in an old church (setting) (scene)(atmosphere) and specialized in undercover high school operations. My partner and I were soon assigned our first mission. Our mission was to impersonate high school students with the ultimate goal of finding the drug dealer that was selling deadly drugs to the students at this high school. When someone passes away (euphemism), things get serious. I think when someone dies there’s probably a problem. (understatement) It is no longer simply buffoonery.
On the first day, we had to figure out how to fit in. This was difficult because we had not attended high school in many years. My partner and I both had identities chosen for us by our unit. As, it turned out, these identities were actually pretty similar to our personalities in real life. It was hard remembering our new names, where we are from, or what our hobbies were; it was similar to becoming a new person. (metaphor)(image) We had to practice our characters about a million times. (hyperbole) After we got our class schedules, we knew it was all becoming real. My partner and I were ecstatic about having to do homework again. (irony)(sarcasm) We were nervous for the kids to speak to us because we could say the wrong thing and ruin the whole mission. 
After figuring out how to blend in, our next step was to start making friends (or attempt to) in order to get inside information. My partner and I decided we should sit with people at lunch and get to know them. We asked them several severely specific (alliteration) questions that could potentially lead to us finding out what we needed to know. We became friends with several students and found out that we needed to spend some time with the swim team. If what we heard is true, then the swim team is where we would find suspects. (antecedent-consequence relationship) We had no suspects yet, but I’m sure you probably know who it is. (narrative intrusion)
After much deliberation and observation, we were starting to develop our suspects. My partner and I seemed to be torn between three people as to who could be guilty. There was finally a day in which we felt like we really blended in with the students. This was the day we discovered who the drug dealer was. After finding out that the suspect was probably on the swim team, we decided to search the locker room. We were going through lockers and found all the evidence (climax) in one of them. The interesting thing was that this was not a student’s locker. It was a teacher’s locker. It turned out, one of the teachers at this school was guilty. It was the swim coach the whole time. He was sneaky, not to mention smart. (paralipsis) It was absolutely shocking. There was never a moment we suspected one of the teachers to be guilty. But, we completed our mission and went out with a bang. (onomatopoeia) And, now that my partner and I have solved the case, our next adventure awaits: impersonating college students.

_________________________________________________________________________________________


Two years after the success of the previously mentioned mission, the secret undercover unit was shut down. (narration) But thankfully, another opened across the street in a different abandoned church building. (setting) (scene) We (point of view) were given a new mission, similar to the last one. (metaphor) In fact, the only difference between the missions was the fact that this one took place in a college, (atmosphere) as opposed to a high school. A student had died from a certain drug sold within this college. The mission was, again, to find the dealer and stop the selling of these very dangerous drugs. We began the same process of making friends and gathering information. My partner made friends with all of the men on the football team and he eventually joined the team to get more inside information. I, on the other hand, began to spend time with art students and find out how much they knew about the selling of this drug. I got close to one student in particular who had a roommate who was not insane at all. (sarcasm) In reality, she couldn’t (contraction) stand her roommate. Throughout our time in these friend groups, we learned that the football team and the art students both knew very much about this drug and were somewhat willing to provide information. During spring break, we visited the same destination the other students were vacationing (Mexico) (parenthesis). While there, the dangerous drug was frequently being sold by a group of people. All of these people worked under the same woman. We saw this woman giving directions to these people and spent the entire day trying to track her down. (act) When we finally found her, she ended up being the art student’s strange roommate. This unexpected ending was just like (simile) our last mission. The good guys (protagonist) won and the bad guy (antagonist) lost. The most unsuspecting citizen was the single suspect (alliteration) we needed to pay the most attention to.

Thursday, November 12, 2015

Disparity in Women as CEO's and political leaders

Pro:

  • Women tend to value team efforts more than men, they're more generous
  • bring more harmony which results in better results for the company because people will be treated more fairly since they wont feel threatened because of the teamwork within the workforce
  • they won't be replaced, they will just be given the higher level jobs
  • advantages to gender diverse workforce because it allows for a more diverse customer base
  • since men and women have different view points, they can better problem solve because of the different types of views
  • debt in america - when more women work, the economies grow, and if you include more women in the political arena, they can better understand what women want 



Con:

  • if you look at any statistic, the amount of women in the workforce and politics is increasing every year
  • no action needs to be taken because the problem is working itself out
  • most of the people in leadership positions are starting to die out and will have to be replaced by the younger generation
  • there are more women in college now 
  • every year there are more women in political positions, eventually they are starting to run for the most high powers
  • they are becoming more strong-willed on their own
  • people are starting to have different ideas about patriarchy 
  • prime minister from Germany has been doing a good job

Friday, November 6, 2015

Short story / vocab

My (point of view) life got pretty interesting when my partner, (flat character) and I became an undercover spies. My partner, who is not the sharpest knife in the drawer, (appositive) and I used to be cops but we weren’t (contraction) very good at it. This is a result of our first arrest; we forgot to read a man his rights. It is against the law to arrest someone without reading their Miranda rights. (data)(evidence) After that, we were moved to a secret undercover unit. This unit had hidden headquarters in an old church (setting) (scene)(atmosphere) and specialized in undercover high school operations. My partner and I were soon assigned our first mission. Our mission was to impersonate high school students with the ultimate goal of finding the drug dealer that was selling deadly drugs to the students at this high school. When someone passes away (euphemism), things get serious. I think when someone dies there’s probably a problem. (understatement) It is no longer simply buffoonery.
On the first day, we had to figure out how to fit in. This was difficult because we had not attended high school in many years. My partner and I both had identities chosen for us by our unit. As, it turned out, these identities were actually pretty similar to our personalities in real life. It was hard remembering our new names, where we are from, or what our hobbies were; it was similar to becoming a new person. (metaphor)(image) We had to practice our characters about a million times. (hyperbole) After we got our class schedules, we knew it was all becoming real. My partner and I were ecstatic about having to do homework again. (irony)(sarcasm) We were nervous for the kids to speak to us because we could say the wrong thing and ruin the whole mission. 
After figuring out how to blend in, our next step was to start making friends (or attempt to) in order to get inside information. My partner and I decided we should sit with people at lunch and get to know them. We asked them several severely specific (alliteration) questions that could potentially lead to us finding out what we needed to know. We became friends with several students and found out that we needed to spend some time with the swim team. If what we heard is true, then the swim team is where we would find suspects. (antecedent-consequence relationship) We had no suspects yet, but I’m sure you probably know who it is. (narrative intrusion)
After much deliberation and observation, we were starting to develop our suspects. My partner and I seemed to be torn between three people as to who could be guilty. There was finally a day in which we felt like we really blended in with the students. This was the day we discovered who the drug dealer was. After finding out that the suspect was probably on the swim team, we decided to search the locker room. We were going through lockers and found all the evidence (climax) in one of them. The interesting thing was that this was not a student’s locker. It was a teacher’s locker. It turned out, one of the teachers at this school was guilty. It was the swim coach the whole time. He was sneaky, not to mention smart. (paralipsis) It was absolutely shocking. There was never a moment we suspected one of the teachers to be guilty. But, we completed our mission and went out with a bang. (onomatopoeia) And, now that my partner and I have solved the case, our next adventure awaits: impersonating college students.

Thursday, November 5, 2015

GMO's

Hanson, Erb, Myers, Lyles

For GMO’s
  • with the use of them, farmers can better be stewards of the environment and grow more crops with less land
  • they are able to keep and make more food, more people can be fed and food prices go down
  • with the population increasing, they help increase crop production using less resources needed to tend to the population
  • foods that re made with gmos have a better taste texture and nutritional value
  • the gmo crop are made to be more resistant to weeds, pests, and disease, especially in corn
  • less pesticides need to be used, therefore less harmful chemicals are put into the environment
  • they are already in 80% of the food we are eating
  • they allow farmers to be able to make crops on less land which is helpful to the increasing population
Counterargument:
  • how about animals? 
      -diseases decrease in animals when the are genetically modifies
  • no, they don’t solve the food crisis, but gross help

Against GMO’s
  • people are not fine from gmos, people get several diseases and have to resort to eating certain products because gross harmed them
  • laws are being made against gmos, the Kevin Law
  • children are getting sick from them because they harvest allergies and cannot process certain foods
  • farmers themselves are spending more money buying what it takes to create these gmos
  • farming technology is not up to par yet
  • gmos and non gmos do not coexists well
  • farmers have actually increased their use of pesticides
  • there is still a global food crisis even with the gmos
  • gmos are toxic and are infecting the air and soil
  • lower levels of biodiversity
  • gmos are playing God, other countries look down at the US for altering nature
Counterargument:

  • a lot of people don’t know anything about it and there are informational videos and documents that can inform people of this issue
  • they have’t been that successful in genetically modifying foods and animals 
  • it is not much of an improvement, gmo science is failing in many instances
  • farmers are not making enough money because of how much it costs to make modified crops
  • we need more advanced technology that is not so harmful

Thursday, October 29, 2015

Fight Club

Because of fight club, I have gained better strategies and skills in order to help me form an argument. I can come up with points to mention that will back up my side of a debate. In a verbal argument, it is easier to compare both sides and get the opposing sides’ opinions in order to form counterarguments. You can also ask your opposing side questions and make your argument stronger by contradicting the your opponent’s statements. Although, I find it easier to form my arguments in writing rather than verbally. It is hard to come up with things to say on the spot. I find my arguments make more sense and are better when I have time to think about it and come up with relevant examples to back up my opinion. My arguments are also more valid when they are written because I can do research on my thoughts to make sure they are legitimate examples. In a verbal argument, you are more likely to say things that are irrelevant or things you aren’t sure are true. But, there are advantages to verbal arguments. The major advantage to fight club is being able to counter argue your opponent, and you also gain argument development skills in your overall writing ability.

Fight Club 10/29

Pro (kill one person to save five) - Maddie Michel
Con (don't need to kill one person to save five) - Rachel Hanson
Scribe - Laura Erb

Pro:
-in this situation with the train, the switch should be flipped - it is better for one person to die rather than many
-if you were at a fork and the train was going to hit 5 unsuspecting people, the switch should be flipped so the train only hits one person on the other side
-if one of the people was sleeping, he wouldn't know what "hit him"
-self-driving cars should be programmed to minimize death, car should be programmed to run off the road and kill driver and passengers to save pedestrians
-more people would end up dying if cars were not programmed to save lives - better that driver dies because then less people die
-a person operating the self-driving car takes on the responsibility of knowing they might die - makes cars safer, less deaths on the road
-final dilemma is with organ failure - people with organ failure should be given option to live instead of one healthy person, because it can allow more people to live
-overall, all these examples show that the decision should be made for the greater good
-90% of people would flip the switch in the study beause it's more logical to save more people than kill more people - human nature to save people
-people have altrustic tendencies to help others - explains why most people would choose to  flip the switch the
-burden of guilt on individual who doesn't act to save more people
-death of single person is easier to bear than death of many - doctor would have lost more lives than if he had harvested the organs and lost one person
-overall, if there must be death, it is morally right that fewer people are sacrificed

Con:
-if you have to risk someone else's life to save a life, then it's not worth it - something could go wrong, and you might end up killing more people than you save
-you can't interfere with what's going to happen (in regards to fate); if people are going to die you can't change that
-no one is going to drive a car that will kill them in order to save other people, plus the technology might not be advanced enough to know when this is completely necessary (may kill you when there's still time for people to get out of the way)
-in a hospital situation, you cannot purposely take someone's life even if it's to save other lives - you have to let the one person live

How about the fat guy situation?
Pro: although you'd feel guilty about causing a death yourself, I'd feel more guilty knowing 5 people died instead of the one. It all goes back to the greater good of many instead of being selfish and just saving one person

Counterargument - pro:
-you would say that in a situation where a car is going towards people, it shouldn't divert from the people - in that situation, you'd kill pedestrians, driver, passengers
-technology malfunction - it's trying to get better, there has to be testing
-driver has to take on risk of them dying
-taking someone's life in regards to organ failure - if the person who is healthy is a murderer, and the other people are sick children, should you save better lives over someone "evil"?

Counterargument - con:
-against self-driving cars
-technology isn't developed, cars can't make split-second decisions
-you can't intentionally take someone else's life, every life matters, the children were going to die anyway

In the situation of a bystander, should you let what is happening happen or should you save more people?
Pro: bystanders should get involved, it would be wrong not to get involved if people can be saved - not sure what they can do, but if they can do something to save people, why not?

What if the one person is a child, and the five people are adults?
Pro: adults should live and kid should die, because saving more people is more important - not fair to say that his life is more important than theirs
Con: Child deserves to live because they have a lot of years ahead of them




Friday, October 23, 2015

Godfrey Flag

Flags are really important for showing city pride and there are some terrible city flags in this country! Watch Roman Mars’ TED talk to find out more…

Godfrey, Illinois’ current flag: 



Redesigned flag: 




The original Godfrey flag has several words and numbers on it, which are against the five basic rules. It has a seal which is also not advised. In my design, I did not include any letters, but attempted to keep it as simple as the original. I kept the same colors from the original Godfrey flag, in case they had symbolic meaning. I was unable to find any meaning or information about the original flag so I used my knowledge of Godfrey to take elements from it and reuse them in my redesigned flag. Godfrey is a small village on the Mississippi River bend. On my flag there is a blue section representing the Mississippi River with a dip in the middle representing the river bend. In the middle is a white circle representing a stone to incorporate the famous rocky bluffs along the river. The three ovals have a double meaning. One symbol they represent are eagle wings. The Godfrey area is a popular place to go eagle-watching and it has been for a very long time. The second meaning is three leaves representing the agriculture of Godfrey and appreciating it’s nature preserves.

Friday, October 16, 2015

Addicts, Mythmakers, and Philosophers

The main point in this article is to have a better understanding to why people cannot give up their addictions. It starts by describing a man who it seems can take any pain and suffering, but cannot give up his alcohol addiction.  The man described has every intent to quit and simply could not. In the article. it is said that, “When he came in for his next appointment he looked pained, shocked and confused. He told me that in spite of his decision to remain abstinent, he drank” (Brody). This story’s purpose was to provide an understanding of just how addicted people get and how quitting seems almost out of their control. 
One point I found interesting is the fact that most people that are addicted to something don’t want to do it anymore, but they can’t stop. I agree with most of what the article says. The article’s point is that that when people get addicted to things, it sometimes gets to the point where they literally cannot stop (47).
A statement in the article I agreed with was, “It’s possible that an addict is able, at times, to control the urge to use; but the addict also might not be able to prevent an urge to use from spontaneously arising and motivating” (Brody). I have witnessed people, such as distant family members, who have gone through an addiction. It is easy to agree with this from what I know about people I know. Another point I found very agreeable was, “It’s common to change one’s mind when faced with temptation.” (Brody). I think this sums up the reason why it is so hard for people to quit. People have every intention to stop and the slightest temptation can change their mind temporarily. It seems to relate to a mental illness in a way, people’s desires seem out of their control in certain moments.
I found it interesting that the article used Socrates’ words to help understand addiction. Socrates explains that we always do what we believe is good. The essence of Socrates argument is that, “When we know the good we will choose to do it; temptation is a power to distort what we think is good” (Brody) (47). In other words, Socrates believes we don’t always do what is good, but we do what we believe is good in that moment (47). I believe it is accurate to call temptation a power that can distort what we think is good, but I believe that may only be a temporary effect and that temptation does not affect someone’s desires and beliefs permanently. 
Overall, I think everything said in the article was accurate, for the most part. It seems to sum up certain things about addiction that people may not know unless they have been addicted to something themselves. Though I concede that people sometimes don’t have control over their addiction, I still insist that with the right amount of effort, anyone can quit doing what they are addicted to (65).

Brody, Alan. "Addicts, Mythmakers and Philosophers." Philosophy Now. 1 Nov. 2015. Web. 13 Oct. 2015. <https://philosophynow.org/issues/90/Addicts_Mythmakers_and_Philosophers>.


Graff, Gerald, Cathy Birkenstein, and Russel Durst. They Say / I Say. 3rd ed. New York: W.W. Norton, 2015. Print.

Thursday, October 15, 2015

Fight Club 10/15

1- Pro (Rachel Hanson)
2- Con (Maddie Myers)
3- Mediator (Maddie Michel)
4- Scribe (Andrew Elston)

1-All media that comes out in todays day in age that comes out is a copy from something else, it’s a post sampling era in which everything is taken from somebody else

1-All work emerges from influences, and even at time people can unconsciously copy what other say and due i.e. music, listening to other peoples works.

3- Is taking someones work honoring or disgracing a person?

1- In regards to fashion, its fine its more of an inspired art form, but music is more of copying as the expression is more on a personal level

3-What are some benefits of imitation

1- When it comes to a technological sense it can only help society as it can improve life overall as new and improved technology can improve that.

2- Nobody owns anything in regards to the english language, if you add a new spice to someone else’s ideas it can add new meaning to an old and stale one. It’s like recycling

3- How is taking things from multiple sources helpful

2- Anything you create is new, think in regards to the GPS it’s pieces are from all aspects of technology, but when they are all combined together they become a whole new and original piece of technology that benefits society. 

3-Whats your opinion on copyright?

2- It depends on the level of copying, it’s logical in sense to seek inspiration from other peoples works but, taking full verses and tunes is a complete copy and should be protected under copyright.

3- Is there in any originality in the technology field? 

2- Both in essence have their own originality the products are very different in the end, their are only so many ideas out there; where you get the pieces from doesn't matter, but the final product does.

2-People can build onto their products, alter and tweak, but it doesn't mean they are unoriginal, they are still making a new idea and it’s still original in essence

3- Lets talk about the fashion industry

1- Fashion is a complete copy no matter what, no single design is derived from originality

2- These dresses do express individuality, designers take pieces from everything they see in their lives. There is a million different types of fabrics and styles, and each designer combines these already constant designs to create something new. Putting certain things together at certain times can create a genius.

3- Where must the line be drawn in regards to copying and inspiration

2- For example the louis Vutton bags, if someone openly copies the label than that should fall under the category of copying.

1- Its more of following a trend instead of copying fashion is about finding inspiration with those trends

3-“To be Human is to copy”

2- of course with anything in life its human nature to be inspired and copy the ideals of the figures in your life that surround you.

1-Kohls boot sale today I’m going after class 




Saturday, October 10, 2015

Coddling of American Mind

The main argument in this article is that college students are overly sensitive and rules have been made because of it. These rules require people to think more thoroughly about everything they say, in order to avoid the possibility of offending someone. I have things I both agree with, and disagree with when it comes to this article. 
The article argues that the reason people might be more offended by things in this day and age is because of how they were raised, and I agree because I can compare how I was raised to how my parents were raised (8). Parents have sheltered the children of this generation more than their parents did for them. The article elaborates by stating the fact that, “free range childhood became less common in the 1980s. The surge in crime from the ’60s through the early ’90s made Baby Boomer parents more protective than their own parents had been.”
It seems even the smallest of things can trigger a negative reaction in people. We always have to be careful in avoiding microaggressions towards others. This article defines microaggressions as, “small actions or word choices that seem on their face to have no malicious intent but that are thought of as a kind of violence nonetheless.” The article then uses the example of asking a foreign person where they were born as a microaggression. 
I think that it is easier to believe in the idea of people being oversensitive when they are offended by such a simple question. People can avoid situations that cause them offense if it really means that much to them. For example, someone might avoid seeing a movie in which warnings were issued describing things that they may take offense to. If they feel passionate about avoiding offense material, they just have to look for the trigger warnings. The article defines trigger warnings as, “alerts that professors are expected to issue if something in a course might cause a strong emotional response.” The article often used classroom situations to describe scenes where someone would take offense in simple things. 
This article also elaborated on the fact that comedians come to college campuses and say things that students get offended by. The article gives specific examples saying, “A number of popular comedians, including Chris Rock, have stopped performing on college campuses. Jerry Seinfeld and Bill Maher have publicly condemned the oversensitivity of college students, saying too many of them can’t take a joke.” It seems this is very likely to be true in most cases. But, there are people that take things to extreme levels when they simply need to brush things off and learn to take a joke. It is often said that if something upsets you, you should do something about it, but I don’t believe that should be expressed after seeing a comedian (24)
At the same time that I believe people should not have to worry quite so much about political correctness in a classroom setting, I also believe people do need to worry about it in a public setting (25). Some classes talk about things that may make people uncomfortable, and that’s just how it has to be. Everyone should have enough common sense to know when they have gone too far, and because they know this, they should be able to speak their mind without worrying about the consequences. Common sense seems to dictate that people need to avoid offending people as much as they can, but it gives them the knowledge to know what they can and cannot say (24).

Graff, Gerald, Cathy Birkenstein, and Russel Durst. They Say / I Say. 3rd ed. New York: W.W. Norton, 2015. Print.

Lukianoff, Greg, and Jonathan Haidt. "The Coddling of the American Mind." The Atlantic. Atlantic Media Company, 1 Sept. 2015. Web. 9 Oct. 2015. <http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/09/the-coddling-of-the-american-mind/399356/>.


Friday, October 2, 2015

Bad Blood

After listening to two versions of the same song, I noticed the messages of these two versions of Bad Blood seem completely different. The difference is the background music and the tone the artists sing in. It is astounding that manipulating such simple things can completely change the message of the song. Both convey their message effectively. In the original Taylor Swift version, the message seems to be that she is angry. Her tone is more aggressive and vengeful. In Ryan Adams version, his tone is sad and the whole song is very calm compared to the Taylor Swift version. The point in the song where the difference in tone really stood out to me was when each artist sang, “Oh, it's so sad to think about the good times, you and I.” When Taylor Swift sings this line, she sounds aggressive and even sarcastic because she says “sad,” but you can tell in the tone of her voice that is not what she means. When Ryan Adams sings this line, he clearly sounds extremely sad and as though he was reflecting on his past with someone. Another line that stood out because of the prominent differences is, “Now we got problems, and I don't think we can solve them.” This is because when Taylor Swift sings it, she point out the fact that they have problems, but you can tell she doesn’t want to solve these problems, but she want to get revenge instead. She sings so aggressively and in a way that is so different from Ryan Adams. Because he sings this line so sadly, I understand he wants to solve whatever problems he has with the person he is singing about. He says this line in a way that makes is seem like his problems with someone are hopeless and beyond fixing. The songs have completely different messages, Taylor Swift’s being about woman power and being fierce. Ryan Adams is about a relationship ending, being upset and wishing it could be fixed, even though it is beyond repair.

Martin, Max. (Producer) Bad Blood [Music Video] Available May 17, 2015, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QcIy9NiNbmo


Adams, Ryan. (Producer) Bad Blood [Audio Video] Available September 17, 2015, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9V-8VP5dnrQ

Thursday, October 1, 2015

Should everyone go to college - Fight Club?

Pro - Jessica

  • Even though education is the lowest paying, it is necessary to go to college because you have to
  • 14% of people with high school diplomas make as much money as people with a bachelor's degree
  • You want to be able to support yourself and a family comfortably
  • If you have a mechanical engineering degree, you are expected to earn $35,000 more than a typical high school graduate
  • Research shows that there is a positive correlation to going to college
  • There is more financial aid than people realize




Con - Rachel 

  • Not every bachelor's degree is a smart investment
  • For the arts, it might be better to just get into the profession rather than go to college
  • If you have a STEM job with a high school diploma, then you are likely to make more money than someone with a bachelor's degree in the humanities, arts, and education
  • Financial aid process needs improvement, because it is not easy for poor families to know about programs and receive financial aid
  • College is only a wise decision if you make wise decision throughout college




Friday, September 25, 2015

argument culture

Argument culture is something that I never really experienced much until my senior year of high school. I had a strange theology teacher and it seemed he believed his sole purpose in life was to start arguments. Every topic we learned about turned into a battle in the classroom. This was because people felt strongly about their opinions and wanted to express them. When people find out someone disagrees with them, they feel the urge to argue and defend their side of an issue. This may or may not accomplish anything. What it potentially could accomplish is changing someone’s mind to agree with your argument. But, most people have set opinions and are not open to considering other’s thoughts. Usually, arguments simply make people think about what they believe and rethink their assumptions. In college, I have already been in several classes in which the professor provokes arguments between students. Professors light up when students engage in heated discussions about the topic at hand. They also seem open to hearing student’s opinions, even if they disagree with them. College professors use argumentation to promote learning and help students develop opinions and beliefs. This is always interesting to participate in and listen to. Usually, the arguments in classes are about important matters that are worth defending. In real life, arguments seem to mostly consist of matters that are not life or death, such as where to eat dinner or what movie to watch. People in my life seem to argue with their roommates, parents, or significant other. It is much more common to argue with someone you love, rather than a stranger. There is constantly conflict between people that care about each other. Conflict can't be avoided in our public lives because there is something to argue about every day. Thankfully, we live in a society where we can express our opinions freely. 

Thursday, September 24, 2015

Fight Club 9/24: Against Meat

Pro: He should be a vegetarian
- He should be a vegetarian because he thinks it is a ethical choice for him to make and that it is also the right choice. 
- The grandma has her ethical beliefs as well. For example when the Russian butcher offered her meat she didn't take it because it was pork and thats against her religion. 
- Although he has good memories eating meat with his family he can create just as many good memories with a different type of food group.
- He will still be able to attend the tradition of going out for chicken and soup on Shabbat without eating then chicken because soup is also a part of the tradition. 
- Although he has gone all his life eating meat that doesn't mean its to late to stop. As for getting protein in your diet there are many different ways to do so. 

Con: He should not be a vegetarian
- Although the grandma believes eating all food that is offered is important because of her past. She is able to limits herself to not eating pork due to her religion but limiting yourself to all types of meat is a large range of food you would have to deny. 
- He has a lot of good memories revolving around meat and his family.
- They have a tradition of going to get chicken on Shabbat if he became a vegetarian he would not be able to eat the chicken as he normally would.
- He has gone all his life eating meat and receiving protein and has been well off.

Friday, September 18, 2015

Elastic Heart Rhetorical Analysis

        When the Sia music video "Elastic Heart" first came out, there was much controversy and talk about it being strange or inappropriate. Much of this was settled by explaining the actual meaning of the choice of dancers and setting. I heard all sorts of rumors about what the video actually meant and even what the words of the song actually meant. Some said it was about Sia growing up with a bad relationship with her father. Some insisted it is about her internal struggles with her past self. I didn't know what explanation she meant to convey, until I recently came across a video where she explains it. 
The young girl in the video is portraying a werewolf type animal and is terrorizing the man in the cage with her. The wolf represents the one of the man's self states, according to Sia. She states, ”we thought it would be interesting if it was as if she is one of his self states, maybe an inner child, maybe like one of his demons." During the video the girl and man are fighting but it seems they possibly resolve their issues towards the end (3:22). This could in some way represent the man being accepting of his other self state. It seems he is in a battle with himself during the video, but maybe tries to accept it.
  The BYU website suggests a rhetorical analysis should show opportunity for persuasion. In this case, Sia is persuading her audience of the message she is trying to convey. Though, the messages in the lyrics and the actual video are slightly different. The lyrics were written about the artist and and the music video uses the lyrics to tell a story about the two characters. Apparently when the lyrics read "you did not break me,” or “I’ve got thick skin” Sia is referring to her past self. She is conveying a message of survival of the past. 
The Texas A&M University Writing Center website talks about how writers use words to influence an audience. This can be related because of the influence and impact the release of this video had on Sia’s fans. People were instantly influenced to search for meaning in the video. 
I myself still do not completely understand the video, especially the scene (4:15) in which the girl escapes from the cage and the man reaches for her. Although, it is easier to explain things when using guidelines such as the steps in Compose, Design, Advocate. One of the steps involves searching for the purpose of the text. When I look at the lyrics of the song on Sia’s official website, it seems the purpose is to get her audience to understand how she struggled, but came out on top. I think she brought this message to the music video and found a way to bring her personal story to a story between two dancers. Her words are powerful and people believe in what she says because they respect her as an artist.

Sia - Elastic Heart feat. Shia LaBeouf & Maddie Ziegler (Official Video). YouTube. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 Sept. 2015.     <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWZGAExj-es>. 

"University Writing Center - Rhetorical Analysis." University Writing Center - Rhetorical Analysis. Texas A&M, 2015. Web. 18 Sept. 2015. <http://writingcenter.tamu.edu/Students/Handouts
-Guides/Guides-(What-Are-You-Writing-)/Academic-Writing/Analysis/Rhetorical-Analysis>.

Burton, Gideon, Dr. "Basic Questions for Rhetorical Analysis." Basic Questions for Rhetorical Analysis. Silva Rhetoricae, n.d. Web. 18 Sept. 2015<http://rhetoric.byu.edu/pedagogy/rhetorical%20analysis
%20heuristic.htm>.

Watson, Meg. "Watch Sia Explain The Meaning Of ‘Elastic Heart’ With Bananas Over Her Face." Junkee. Disqus, 21 Jan. 2015. Web. 18 Sept. 2015. <http://junkee.com/watch-sia-explain-the-meaning-of-elastic-heart-with-bananas-over-her-face/49420>.


Wysocki, Anne Frances, and Dennis A. Lynch. "Rhetorical Analysis." Compose, Design, Advocate: A Rhetoric for Integrating Written, Visual, and Oral Communication. Second Edition ed. New York: Longman, 2007. 316-317. Print.

Thursday, September 17, 2015

Fight Club: Misguided Campaign to Get Rid of Single-Sex Classroomms

For (Loftus)
  1. All girls feel more comfortable and confident to answer questions because guys won't make fun of them
  2. Gives girls no pressure if there are no guys (even the shy ones)
  3. If girls learned better in an all girls environment they then would be more comfortable when put into situations with men
  4. Single-sex schools should also be public rather than only private because some less fortunate families cannot pay the price of private schools
  5. Stereotyping of genders are toned down, everyone is free to speaking their mind
  6. The way the teacher teaches the class would benefit each gender, how the class is organized
  7. Putting developing teenagers into same-sex schools will give them confidence to interact with their own gender before the other gender (i.e. such as making same-sex friends and then starting a relationship with someone)
Against (Hanson)
  1. School is supposed to prepare you for real life, and in real life you are not only going to be secluded to your own gender group
  2. Competition makes people work harder, which in turn, benefits them
  3. Shouldn't  matter what gender people are learning with, also it could be discriminating to only be with one gender
  4. Same-sex students may not know how to interact with the other gender later on in life in some situations
  5. There is more competition in gym classes if they are co-ed (people want to impress each other)
  6. All guy classrooms could be rowdier than if they were co-ed classes
  7. Less talking, act smarter, want to impress the opposite sex
(Scribe: Noble)