The
main argument of the article as a whole is that addiction is
much more than it is led on to be. When it comes to the topic
of addiction, most of us
will readily agree that personal
experience may be rare, but addiction has affected your life in some
way (Graff 26). Whether that be a family member, friend, colleague
or simply hearing about it in the media, it is prevalent; and
therefore, addiction should be talked about to rid it of the stigma that
this problem should make you feel embarrassed and like you cannot talk
about it. Within the article by Alan Brody, I have chosen to focus
on the section titled, "Socrates on Self-Mastery".
Brody
himself writes, "Socrates
holds that when we know the good we will choose to do it, he attributes to
temptation a power to distort what we think is good" (Graff 46, Brody).
I agree with this statement. The thought process being, the
addict has a choice, whether to fall into the trap again to allow the bad to
tempt you into doing the deed again. The author, Brody,
advocates, Socrates' suggestion that knowledge is all we need to defeat the
temptations (Graff 39, Brody). In other words, knowledge allows a person to avoid being deceived
about what the right decision is and to continue by pursuing the true
good (Graff 135, Brody).
"It
means having the right kind of ability to both choose and do what
is best, and this is what having self-mastery means" (Brody). With
that being said, my argument would fight Brody's concluding statement,
"When we realize that luck is required to put into place what was needed
in order to have what would have enabled us to have done better, more
compassion might arise towards ourselves and others, as we see how the trouble
we bring about is also what fortune sets up for us." I find parts of the
article contradictory saying that the choice inquires knowledge but then later
stating it's all luck. But on the other hand, I still insist that if
everyone is properly educated about habits or substances that you can easily
get addicted to, it is one hundred percent your choice to consume that drug or
to perform that task (Graff
89). Granted, some situations and
backgrounds prove harder to come out clean, but it still can be
done because the choice is yours. Brody claims, "...one
fails to choose to do the good one previously preferred because one doesn’t
have the ability (the know-how) to see it as the better alternative (perhaps
only momentarily). To do what is best one must therefore develop this
ability/know-how" (Brody). The argument that if the addict
never makes the right, positive decision, things will never change because the
person never sees the bright side of doing what is right.
I agree with this article to some extent. Brody's concepts are
intriguing but I do see contradictory statements within the piece
that make it hard to complete agree with.
Brody, Alan. "Addicts, Mythmakers and Philosophers." Philosophy Now.
Philosophy Now, 2012. Web. 13 Oct. 2015. <https://philosophynow.org/issues/90/Addicts_Mythmakers_and_Philosophers>.
Graff, Gerald, Cathy Birkenstein, and Russel Durst. They Say / I Say. 3rd ed. New York:
W.W. Norton, 2015. Print.
I agree that Brody's article is contradictory in places. His arguments about why people succumb to temptation don't rule out people still having to choose to do things based on value judgements.
ReplyDeleteI like you example discussing how personal experience may be rare... Also your transitions like "that being said" are great. good post.
ReplyDeleteYou bring up some good points with your revealing of certain contradictions. Your statement about choosing to try something that is addictive being "one hundred percent you choice" is true, but it also seems harsh. For example, the consumption of alcohol has become so common in our society, and there are few people of age who have not tried it. The National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism reports that about 7% of Americans have an alcohol abuse disorder. Most people who drink understand that they could become addicted, but the percentage of that is so small that it is often overlooked. For someone who has never drank alcohol, it seems unreasonable to them that they abstain for a risk that is often deemed so out of the question when compared to the rewards.
ReplyDelete