The main point of the section of the article titled
“Addiction is a Disorder” is “addiction is not just a condition made up of a
bunch of weak-willed acts” because an addiction takes over a person’s entire
being (Brody). Brody’s theory of
addiction as a disorder is extremely useful because it shed light on the
difficult problem of how to approach handing an addiction (Graff 62). It
cannot be seen as simply a mind over matter situation because addiction is like
a disease. For example, Hal, the nurse who is addicted to painkillers, “didn’t
want to continue with the nightmarish lifestyle he was engaged in,” but “he
couldn’t stop” (Brody). It is difficult to understand the state of mind that an
addict endures. Brody is surely right
about his analysis of an addict’s motivations (Graff 62). Brody’s point is that addiction “undermines their
ability to accurately assess their problem’s seriousness as it repetitively
generates a willingness or motivation for acting in violation of their most
important preferences, even knowingly” (Graff 47)(Brody). Most addicts do not
acknowledge that they have a problem, until something tragic happens to bring
them back to reality. These assertions
challenge people’s common assumption that addicts simply do not wish to get
better (Graff 96). Yet, addicts become blind to their condition, and all
that they think about is their drug of choice. Until an addict can “realize how
insane [he has] become,” he will not change (Brody). However, once that pivotal
moment manifests itself, then there can be immense change in the right
direction towards healing the condition.
Brody, Alan. "Addicts, Mythmakers, and Philosophers." Philosophy Now. Philosophy Now:
2012. Web. 15 Oct. 2015.
Graff, Gerald, Cathy Birkenstein, and Russel Durst. They Say I Say. New York: W.W. Norton
& Company, Inc., 2015. Print.
I like your definition that you gave as the main argument of Brody's article, I think it is a good summation of the section. I also liked the last paradigm that you used from Graff, I thought you shaped it nicely to help support your argument.
ReplyDeleteFrom Abigail Halter, not sure why it's not showing my name
DeleteThe TS/IS paradigms that you used constructed very good points for your argument. Though I, personally, don't know the experiences that addicts go through, you help shed a light on the conditions that overcome them.
ReplyDelete