In the article “Addicts,
Mythmakers and Philosophers”, one of the main arguments is that addiction is a
type of disorder and that it is not just “misinformed choice”. I agree that, addiction is often misunderstood. Reading this
article helped me better understand addiction (Graff 2).
One
of the stronger claims portray addictions as more than just a “bunch of
weak-willed acts”. In other words, often
times, society categorizes people suffering from addictions into unstable
subgroups (Graff
135). These victims are handicapped by more than “just a condition”,
they live with a disease.
Another
point argued in the article referred to the fact that addicts do not realize
their obsessions. Because they do not
see their dependence, it makes it that much more difficult to quit. Sometimes,
the article explains, it takes some “craziness” or “danger” for the addict to
understand how out of control the issue is. The reality of the matter is that these
addictions are taking over and it is not by choice.
On the other hand, the article also
demonstrates that while addictions are not choices, they still alter the
addict’s life (Graff 2). It was mentioned that the problem often becomes
unmanageable. This is supported by the idea that “addiction undermines the
person’s self regulation.” Through this it is seen that while the article
fosters foundation for addiction support, it also recognizes that a problem
does exist. The article is stating that addictions are problematic, but they
are also not controllable.
My conclusion, then, is that, the
articles offers arguments in support of the theory that addictions are disorders.(Graff
136). Brody provides the evidence needed to demonstrate that an addiction is an
illness. These problems are more than just a choice, and the people suffering
from the disorder need continued support.
Brody, Alan. "Addicts, Mythmakers and Philosophers." Philosophy Now.
Philosophy Now, 2012. Web. 13 Oct. 2015. <https://philosophynow.org/issues/90/Addicts_Mythmakers_and_Philosophers>.
Graff, Gerald, Cathy Birkenstein, and Russel Durst. They Say / I Say. 3rd ed. New York:
W.W. Norton, 2015. Print.
I liked the support you used from the article, as I think it really strengthened your main points. I like how you paraphrased the article and quoted many short phrases like "danger", "just a condition", "craziness", ect. This helped distinguish your points from the points of the article and then comment on how they do or don't relate.
ReplyDelete