Tragedy is a hard thing to write about. The writer needs to be aware of the topic as
well as the audience. They do not know
who will be reading their paper, and in the case of 9/11, someone who was
directly affected by the attacks may react differently than someone who has no
relation to the attacks except for being an American. The writer also has to show extensive
knowledge about the subject. To get a
fact wrong in an article about a tragedy would be extremely insensitive to the
victims, as well as the rest of the people affected.
How one
writes about tragedy also changes with the level of understanding that the
audience holds. For example, when
explaining a death of a family member to a child, a parent is likely to be more
simplistic in their explanation, as opposed to when adults are speaking to each
other, the person who is explaining will go into more depth, telling how the
person died, and using more complex terms.
The
September 11 attacks are still a very touchy subject for a majority of people
in the United States. They had effects
that are still seen prominently today. I
do not remember anything from that date in 2001. My memories are false memories, ones that I
think I remember, but they are really just from stories that I have heard or
news specials that I have watched. My
memory of 9/11 is not one that happened on that date, but one that happened a
few years ago. While traveling in New
York City, my family and I got into a taxi, whose driver was in the Twin Towers
during the attacks. He had written his
story and had copies of it in the backseat of the cab. He talked to us about what happened that day,
and it was a chilling experience to meet a person who was directly affected by
the tragedy.
Tragedy
is a tough subject for anyone, and addressing it takes time and patience.
How might someone write differently if they were addressing an audience closely associated with a tragedy as opposed to an unrelated third party?
ReplyDeleteHow might someone write differently if they were addressing an audience closely associated with a tragedy as opposed to an unrelated third party?
ReplyDelete