Out of all the times I’ve heard the
word ‘rhetoric,’ I never actually knew what it meant. I knew what rhetorical
meant, which in my mind before this assignment, carried the same meaning as
rhetoric. I always thought rhetoric was just the noun version of rhetorical. As
you probably know, these two words do not mean the same thing. Rhetorical is
when you speak to someone with a question and don’t expect an answer. In Silva
Rhetoricae, rhetoric is defined as “the study of effective speaking and writing.
And the art of persuasion. And many other things.” So as you can see,
rhetorical and rhetoric are quite opposite. With that being said, after
learning what rhetoric actually means, I am able to create my own definition of
the word. I would best define rhetoric as the learning of proper writing and
speaking techniques that can help someone fully explain themselves in perfect
harmony and clarity. With that being said, I also believe rhetoric is a tool
that every student must possess in order to have any conversation, whether in
the work place or on twitter. In addition, I believe that rhetoric helps you
propose proper communication with others no matter what the topic. I also
believe that with proper study of rhetoric, a student may use this skill to
better their view points. By studying rhetoric you could make your arguments
full of persuasive thoughts and substance, instead of the constant rambling
most arguments get in to now and days.
Now
that I have my own definition of rhetoric, I must apply it to our regular
English class discussions. At this point in time, we are discussing how to
clearly explain our own arguments to our readers. We are discussing how to
agree or disagree with arguments. We’ve learned how to put ourselves in others’
shoes. We have discussed the proper ways to quote and summarize other people’s
works and mold them into our own. These lessons help us recognize what we are
trying to do, improve our rhetoric. As I said in my definition of rhetoric, we
must learn to properly write and speak with clarity of what side we are on in
an argument. In class, we have been trying to cram in the back of minds how to
pick a side in an argument. Class recently has been trying to teach us how to
understand both sides of the argument before we jump in to our argument. I
believe knowing both sides allows you to better your argument. Knowing both
arguments, in a way, makes you smarter and better prepared. By my definition of
rhetoric, preparing and planning can help you succeed in the world of rhetoric.
What
I found helpful about this website is that has a vast amount of information
that I can come back and use in the future. The huge list of vocab words gives
me an idea of strong words I could use in an essay or assignment. Also, on the
left side of the website there are explanation of certain categories of rhetoric.
Having spent a whole summer not doing English, reading this side helps give me
a summary of what I forgot. What I dislike about this website is that it isn’t
very clean. When I mean clean, I mean the website seems scattered and poorly
put together. With the vocab, you have to scroll a solid minute or so to get to
the letter Z. Instead of vertically lining up the words, they should try going horizontal
or have a separate page for the words.
Burton, Gideon O. "The Forest of Rhetoric." Silva
Rhetoricae. Brigham Young University, n.d. Web. 3 Sept. 2015.
<http://rhetoric.byu.edu/>
I really liked your definition of rhetoric. It was pretty different from some of the others I have read thus far. With what you know about rhetoric now, do you think it will strengthen your argument in the classroom? If yes, how so?
ReplyDeleteAt the end of your first paragraph, you make a good point about the de-evolution of many arguments into rambling. Maybe you could give a brief hypothetical situation illustrating how it could prevent the rambling, focusing on whichever aspect of rhetoric you feel is most helpful in this circumstance.
ReplyDelete