You scream, I
scream, but it is not for ice cream. Since the beginning of time, people have
been arguing and they will continue to do so for years to come. When I consider
the argumentative culture around me, there are various disputes that come to
mind. In recent weeks, I have heard arguments about grades, money, ethical
issues, equality, and a million others. Those that I hear arguing are arguing
with their spouse, friends, boyfriend/girlfriend, teachers, and colleagues.
Some arguments did not accomplish anything, it only made matters worse or
mattes were never resolved. In other cases, change was sparked, compassion was
felt, and life move on.
When
it comes to arguing, I too myself engage. I, however, am one that attempts to
avoid conflict and confrontation. Yet it seems to seek me out on various occasions.
In some, but not most, of my classes, arguing or debating is allowed.
Professors yearn for passion, opposition, and accurate use of references from
their students. They encourage us to argue because it is a healthy form of
expression. They want us to formulate ideas and submerge ourselves in the ever-changing
world in which we live. But for good reason, there are limitations on these
debates. Arguing does not have a necessity for loud tones, attitude, or
cruelty. One is not to raise their voice above normal octaves and one must
never attack their peers. By making the space rigid and uncomfortable the argument
has taken a course for the worse and should cease immediately. For any morally
sane person would never allow the belittling of another student.
An
argument that I wish to share is one that was had in my Professional Ethics
course here at Saint Louis University. At the beginning of each class we are to
report on ethical issues we have come across within the week and we will debate
on how they should be handled or what can be done about them in the future. One
class period, the ethical issue of gratuity was brought up. Though gratuity is
not enforced it is greatly appreciated and widely accepted. Unfortunately one
of my peers, who also works as a waitress, made a comment that ignited a flame
within me. She said that black people did not leave good tips. I was furious
that she had let that escape the sanctity of her mind. There was an ethical
issue there on top of her own. Not only had she stereotyped, she was racial
profiling.
Due
to the bluntness of her comment not many knew what to say. I was the first to
raise my hand and I rejected each word that exited her mouth. I sternly, but
politely explained to her that BLACK people do leave nice tips. Being one that
dines out nearly every evening and also working as a waitress myself, I had the
authority to make that statement. Whenever I dine out I always leave twenty
percent or more if the service is good or exceeds expectation. Obviously if the
service is bad, then I would leave less than twenty percent or nothing at all
depending on the circumstance. She did not know I was a waitress, so she asked
how I would know if they tip well. And I smugly stated that I was a waitress. (Insert
evil laugh.) I explained to her that I have served people of all races and that
if she wanted me to be candid that Orientals, Russians, Jamaicans, Hispanics,
and Whites are bad tippers too. She then went into speaking on how they were “ghetto”and
rude. I then had to explain to her that there is a difference between being “ghetto”
and being upset. Many servers misconstrue the two which I also stated to her.
At
this point her face is red and I can see that she is royally upset. WE continue
to go back and forth and I end the dispute by telling her that people always
say the customer is always right. So if we follow this standard, maybe it was
not the consumers who left a bad tip. Maybe it was a bad server who got the tip
she deserved. After about two minutes of silence, we moved on to the next ethical
issue, but the one prior had not left my mind. In this case, there were two
points of debate, the ethical issues of gratuity and racism. Hopefully, our
argument taught her not to profile those that are not of the same sin tone as
yourself and to be a better server. If anything, the only thing that I hurt would
be her pride, but I feel our argument was extremely helpful. I made sure not to
criticize her and I did not deny that people do not leave satisfactory tips.
Our argument was encouraged and monitored, we were in a safe space. But if you scream
and I scream, there is nothing for us to take away.
I have also noticed that professors like when their students form arguments. For me this is something that I struggle with. From the Professional Ethics class argument you described, it seems like you are comfortable with confrontation. That being said, do you think that argumentation should be encouraged more at an earlier age, say, starting in high school?
ReplyDeleteI am not comfortable with it by any means. As I stated before I avoid it. However, racism is not something I tolerate, nor should anyone. To answer your question, yes I do believe it should be encouraged, in high school and middle school. It not only develops vocational skills but it can aid adolescence in logic and reasoning.
ReplyDelete