What is rhetoric? How can it be defined?
According to Silva Rhetoricae, "Rhetoric is the study of effective
speaking and writing. And the art of persuasion. And many other things." Usually
when you seek the meaning of a word, the definition is more concrete and
finite. So do the lack of limitation, I have created my own definition of
rhetoric in addition to Dr. Burton’s. Rhetoric is the act and research of
eloquent engagement into conversation. Though both definitions are similar I
use the word eloquent in mine to describe the type of effectiveness needed
within rhetoric. There are five canons within rhetoric which consist of style,
memory, invention, delivery, and arrangement. These canons provide a pattern,
or a template so to speak, aiding the writer analytically and generatively.
Invention is researching points of talk
and finding words for one's claims. The next step is arrangement, after deciding
upon what type of vocabulary will be used, one must add structure and order to
their speech. After doing so, the fun begins. One can now express themselves
creatively in the style sector. As explained by Dr. Burton, while
"invention addresses what is to be said; style addresses how this
will be said." The fourth portion is memory, however memory not only
pertains to you, but your audience as well. As the speaker, on occasion you are
to memorize your speech and present it to others orally. The audience's role in
the memory sector is depending upon the choices you make within invention,
arrangement, and style. One's choices can cause your speech to be
remembered for ions or quickly forgotten. Memory ties us into our final canon,
delivery. Delivery refers to how your rhetoric is given and perceived by the
audience. It includes gestures, facial expression, and resonance. Burton compares
delivering a speech to a performance, and advises rhetorical training. Without
practicing one can as Burton puts it, get lost in the forest behind the trees.
Having been in Advanced Strategies in Rhetoric
& Research for two weeks, I believe that this website along with our Graff
novel will be supplemental to our rhetorical growth. By implementing the ideals
and practices into each of our different styles of rhetoric, we can become more
efficient, effective, and eloquent speakers and writers. These changes do not
happen overnight, but gradually we will begin to see the various patterns
rhetoric paves in the world of linguistics. Simple starts would be considering
pathos, logos, and ethos. We could begin by defining these Greek terms,
learning why they are used, and how to apply them into our speech. By using
different strategies of appeal we not only strengthen our claim but we can
persuade our audience. Another reason to take Dr. Burton’s webpage into
consideration is because if one yearns for better content, one must first learn
the methods and means of communication.
To be candid, first viewing the webpage it
looked dry and irrelevant. So I figured there would be nothing I could take
away from it. However, after reading the introduction, I dived deeper into
the makings of rhetoric, I had not only grasped new concepts, but upgraded my
knowledge on information previously learned. The new concepts I learned and
plan to implement immediately are the five canons of rhetoric. I now know they
exist, what they are, and their role within your speech. The information I had
expanded on was the persuasive appeals of ethos, pathos, and logos. Though they
were introduced to me in middle school, their use and the reason behind them
have become more and more evident. On the one hand, I was happy to be able to
retain what I had read, but on the other hand, I am still confused as to the
branches of oratory. I found them to be unhelpful and more perplexing than
necessary. But in all Dr. Burton has truly enriched my world of rhetoric.
I really like that you included eloquence in your definition of rhetoric because I think it goes hand-in-hand with the website's definition. And, you did a great job of writing an eloquent blog post that also has thoughtful arguments. You supported well why you chose to adopt certain aspects of Silva Rhetoricae's ideas.
ReplyDeleteI like how you went in depth about the five canons within rhetoric, giving examples, and just in general making it more easy to understand how the canons are used. I agree with what you said about how by using different strategies of rhetoric, a person can better persuade their audience, as well as strengthen their argument.
ReplyDeleteI find the way you lined out the five canons of rhetoric extremely helpful - you gave great examples of how an argument is developed and improved through those five steps. I also agree that these changes in the way we write can't happen overnight. After reading this webpage, I found myself wondering how I could take all this information in and remember it, but I realized that my writing ability will improve gradually and through much practice.
ReplyDelete